This report contains biodiversity, species and environmental information about Obo and Sao Tome e Principe. It starts with a simple
overview of Obo, including links to external databases such as WDPA, Ramsar, BirdLife International, World Heritage, UNESCO and Google Earth.
Then it summarises our protected area indicators, including species irreplaceability, habitat irreplaceability and pressure on the park.
The species found with in the park (according to various species databases) are summarised and their IUCN categories, with links to detailed species information that can be found in this report.
The long term environmental trends and environmental seasonality information are provided for the park, and this is followed by country level information.
The map to the right shows: Sao Tome e Principe with Obo in purple; protected areas in our study in green and; all other protected areas in grey. Move your mouse over the image to see the park clearly.
Information on this protected area is provided by The World Database on Protected Areas
which is held at the UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) and is managed in partnership with IUCN - The World Conservation Union. It is continually updated, so if you can help with this process please email
protectedareas@unep-wcmc.org - quoting the name, country and/or site code of any site that you have improved information for.
General information about Obo
| Name | Obo |
| Designation | EU Funded PA |
| IUCN category | Nat |
| IUCN definition |
No information. |
| WDPA site sheet from UNEP-WCMC | Site code = 124355 from the World Database on Protected Areas. |
| Country (ISO code) | Sao Tome e Principe (STP) |
| Ecoregion | SAO TOME AND PRINCPIPE |
| Area (hec) | 25157 |
| Average annual rainfall (mm) | 2493 |
| Altitude range (m) | 0 to 1973 |
| Location (latitude, longitude) | 0.22N 6.55E. View the park in Google Earth or in Google Maps |
Protected areas extrated from "WDPA Consortium 2006 World Database on Protected Areas" - Copyright UNEP-WCMC (2006). Altitude from SRTM data. Rainfall from WorldClim data.
This section describes the indicators that were developed to characterise the PA in terms of threats and pressures to species and their habitats.
We have generated species irreplaceability indicators for three taxa, Mammals, Birds and Amphibians. This was done by counting how many protected areas a species occurs in (n), and adding 1/n to the SI index of each of those protected areas. We also characterise the habitat of each of our studied PAs in Africa based on climate, terrain, land cover and human population, to create an indicator of habitat irreplaceability such that the more irreplaceable a PA habitat is, the higher the ranking in any potential prioritisation scheme. Finally, we have computed two pressure indicators that aim to quantify the threat to species within the PA - by (i) estimating the population pressure in the surrounding area and (ii) quantifying the amount of agriculture found in the immediate vicinity of the protected area.
These indicators are represented in a series of graphs and tables which give an overview
of the irreplaceability of the PA and the pressures on the PA, relative to the average values for the country and ecoregion.
The radar plot - to the right - shows all six of the PA indicators for this park in red along with the country averages which are grey.
Each indicator has been scaled from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest) to allow easy comparison.
Below is a tabular summary of the ranking of this PA with respect to other PAs in the same country and same ecoregion. If the PA is in the top five for this indicator, it is highlighted in red.
Irreplaceability and pressure indicators for Obo
| Indicator | Country ranking (out of 1) | Ecoregion ranking (out of 1) |
|---|---|---|
| Mammal irreplaceability | 1 | 1 |
| Bird irreplaceability | no species | no species |
| Amphibian irreplaceability | 1 | 1 |
| Habitat irreplaceability | 1 | 1 |
| Agricultural pressure | 1 | 1 |
| Population pressure | 1 | 1 |
The individual indicator bar charts (below) show the ranking of the PA when compared to all other PAs in the same country and in the same ecoregion.
Firstly, in order to provide a general overview of the spatial distribution of species richness, endemism, and threat over the whole continent, a 1km resolution map was calculated using the geographical distributions of all species for the three different taxa.
Secondly, a species irreplaceability (SI) index was calculated for each protected area, with respect to all the species of a given taxon. This was done by counting how many protected areas a species occurs in (n), and adding 1/n to the SI index of each of those protected areas. The same procedure was carried out for all species in a given taxon.






Species irreplaceability (from top to bottom) for mammals, birds and amphibians,
by country (left) and ecoregion (right).
This component of the method aims to characterise the habitat of each of the PAs in Africa that have an area of at least 1,000 hectares. Typically a protected area contains a specific habitat that can be characterised by climate, terrain, land cover and human population. With such a characterisation, it is possible to identify similar areas within the same biome. Naturally some areas will be more similar to the PA habitat than others, and for some PAs there may be large areas of similar habitat and yet others PA habitats may be unique.
Here, we have identified and ranked PAs based on their habitat similarity, and we have created an indicator of the habitat irreplaceability (HI) of the PA. The more irreplaceable a PA habitat is, the higher the ranking in any potential prioritisation scheme. The habitat similarity is computed using the Mahalanobis distance metric.



Habitat irreplaceability by country (top left) and ecoregion (top right), and
a map of similar habitats (bottom).
This component of the method aims to quantify the level of threat to the PA - and by proxy the threat to species within the PA - by (i) estimating the population pressure in the surrounding area and (ii) quantifying the amount of agriculture found in the immediate vicinity of the protected area.
The premise for the population pressure (PP) index is that high population density within and around the PA implies: (i) High pressure for land use conversion (conversion to agricultural use) in the buffer zone around the PA and within the PA itself. (ii) Higher levels of fishing and hunting in and around the PA. (iii) Higher risk of small scale deforestation (thinning) for timber and fuel. (iv) Higher risk of intentional burning and clearing.
Not all these factors may be applicable to a single PA, but if one or more of these risk are present then we suggest that population pressure is a reasonable indicator of these factors.




Population pressure by country (top left) and ecoregion (top right), and
population density for year 2000 (bottom left) and park location (bottom right).
For the agricultural pressure (AP) index, we assume that the greater the extent of agricultural land that is found immediately next to the boundary of the PA, then the more pressure there is likely to be on land cover conversion within the boundary of the PA. This is considered a threat to the habitat and consequently the species found within a protected area.




Agricultural pressure by country (top left) and ecoregion (top right), and
landcover for year 2000 (bottom left) and park location (bottom right).
This section lists the species from our three studued taxa that are potentially associated with this PA. The first table summarises the number of species per taxa per IUCN Red List category. The second table explains the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria which are intended to be an easily and widely understood system for classifying species at high risk of global extinction. This is followed by up to three tables, one for each class (Mammals, Birds, Amphibians). Each table shows the IUCN category which links to the species distribution map, the number of areas in our study where each species is found, and links more detailed species information in the IUCN Red List database and associated species databases.
These species lists are work in progress. We are continually improving the methodology behind these assessments of species within the protected areas. We will update these tables in mid 2008.
Species potentially associated with the PA by taxa and by IUCN category (click on the links for more details).
| Category | Total | Mammals | Amphibians | Birds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Critically endangered | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Endangered | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Vulnerable | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Near threatened / Conservation dependent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Least concern | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Data deficient | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not evaluated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Code | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| CR | Critically endangered | A taxon is Critically Endangered when it is facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild in the immediate future, as defined by any of the criteria A to E. |
| EN | Endangered | A taxon is Endangered when it is not Critically Endangered but is facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future, as defined by any of the criteria A to E. |
| VU | Vulnerable | A taxon is Vulnerable when it is not Critically Endangered or Endangered but is facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future, as defined by any of the criteria A to E. |
| NT/CD | Near threatened / Conservation dependent | A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened. Near Threatened species may also include those which are dependent on conservation efforts to prevent their becoming threatened. |
| LC | Least Concernt | A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category. |
| DD | Data Deficient | A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. A taxon in this category may be well studied, and its biology well known, but appropriate data on abundance and/or distribution are lacking. Data Deficient is therefore not a category of threat or Lower Risk. Listing of taxa in this category indicates that more information is required and acknowledges the possibility that future research will show that threatened classification is appropriate. It is important to make positive use of whatever data are available. In many cases great care should be exercised in choosing between DD and threatened status. If the range of a taxon is suspected to be relatively circumscribed, if a considerable period of time has elapsed since the last record of the taxon, threatened status may well be justified. |
| NE | Not Evaluated | A taxon is Not Evaluated when it is has not yet been assessed against the criteria. |
1 IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1 (2001) http://www.iucnredlist.org/info/categories_criteria.html
Mammal species considered threatened by IUCN that occur within this Protected Area,
based on overlaps with habitat and range maps from the African Mammals Databank1
| IUCN | English name | Scientific name | Family | Number of studied PAs where species is found | IUCN Red List database2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUSpecies extent map
|
African manatee | Trichechus senegalensis | Trichechidae | 93 | 22104 |
This list only contains mammal species considered threatened at the global level by IUCN that occur within this Protected Area,based on overlaps with habitat and range maps from the African Mammals Databank. The data bank models the Area of Occupancy of 281 species, belonging to 28 families, over the whole African continent excluding Madagascar. It does NOT contain the rhinos for preserving the confidentiality of their distribution, nor the elephant since there is a more detailed database by the Elephant Specialist Group of the Species Survival Commission SSC/IUCN.
1. African Mammals Databank (1999) IEA (Institute of Applied Ecology), Italy: http://www.gisbau.uniroma1.it/amd.php
2. IUCN (2006) 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: http://www.iucnredlist.org
Amphibian species considered threatened by IUCN that occur within this Protected Area,
based on overlaps with range maps from the Global Amphibian Assessment1
| IUCN | English name | Scientific name | Family |
Number of studied PAs where species is found |
IUCN Red List database2 |
Global Amphibian Assessment species factsheet1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENSpecies extent map
|
Newton's Grassland Frog | Ptychadena newtoni | Ranidae | 1 | 58514 | 58514 |
ENSpecies extent map
|
Sao Tome Giant Treefrog | Hyperolius thomensis | Hyperoliidae | 1 | 56289 | 56289 |
LCSpecies extent map
|
Sao Tome Caecilian | Schistometopum thomense | Caeciliidae | 1 | 59592 | 59592 |
LCSpecies extent map
|
Moller?s Gulf Frog | Hyperolius molleri | Hyperoliidae | 1 | 56288 | 56288 |
LCSpecies extent map
|
Peters' River Frog | Phrynobatrachus dispar | Ranidae | 1 | 58107 | 58107 |
This lists only contains amphibian species from the Global Amphibian Assessment (GAA), which is the first-ever comprehensive assessment of the conservation status of the world's 5,743 known species of frogs, toads, salamanders, and caecilians.
1. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe (2006) IUCN Global Amphibian Assessment: http://www.globalamphibians.org
2. IUCN (2006) 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: http://www.iucnredlist.org
This first graph shows the start, peak and end of all detected growing seasons in the PA for 1983 to 2002. The data can be used to "assess deviations in the vegetation calendar, as an indicator of interannual variation of vegetation status, to forecast the development of climate driven diseases, and to support long term analysis in terms of land cover change - such as a change in vegetation type associated with permanent change in the vegetation calendar." (Phenology Product Sheet) The growing season data will be updated soon to include information from 2002 to the present day.

Historical phenology data derived from GAC NDVI curves. See VGT4Africa website for methodology.
The second graph shows the long term averages for monthly rainfall and temperature ranges for the PA. This information helps to interpret the phenology data above. This data is taken from 1km resolution interpolated climate surfaces, and so it should be taken as a general overview of the climate in the PA and surrounding region.

Average climate data based on the WorldClim 50 year monthly climate data.
These two graphs show the same environmental data in different ways. The first graph shows the dekadal (10 day composites) values for rainfall, small water body presence, a water index (NDWI), a vegetation index (NDVI) and active fires for the past 10 years, where data were available. This graph clearly shows any variation in the environmental factors from year to year and any long term trends.

Long term patterns in rainfall, small waterbodies, NDWI and NDVI.
The second graph, shows how the environmental factors for this year and last year compare to the long term average. For each factor, we have plotted the dekadal values for the previous year (2007) and we update the graph every 10 days as data for this year (2008) becomes available. The dark gray line on each graph is the average for each dekad based on the available timeseries, and the light grey areas indicate the 95% confidence limits around this average. From these graphs we can see if there are any differences between this year and last year, how this compares to the average, and whether the differences are significantly different from the average.

Trends in rainfall, small waterbodies, NDWI and NDVI.
Fires are central in the ecology of African tropical savannas and are commonly used as a tool for managing the tree-grass balance in protected areas. Because of their impacts on the habitats, fires are also used for conservation purposes. We monitor fire seasonality considering the number of fire events per unit area over a 10-day period (decade). This information is important to understand the level of protection in the PAs and in their surrounding zone. The density of fires observed inside and outside a PA is used as an indicator of the PA's ecological peculiarity.
The graph below reports the number of active fires detected in the PA and the 25km buffer zone. The period shown starts at the beginning of the dry season until present, information is updated as soon as satellite data become available. Active fire data come from the NASA funded Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS).